We often listen or read about many achievement tales. However what is achievement plus what criteria should companies utilize to recognize achievement? What aspects lead to a lucrative project? The purpose of the article is to define project achievement criteria, simplify their difference with success aspects plus analyse their importance in project administration methodology.
One of the vaguest concepts of project administration is project achievement. Since each individual or number of those who are involved with a project have different desires plus expectations, its quite unsurprising which they interpret project achievement in their own method of learning Cleland & Ireland, 2004, p2. "For those involved a project, project achievement is commonly thought of because the accomplishment of some pre-determined project goals" Lim & Mohamed, 1999, p244 whilst the public has different views, commonly based about consumer satisfaction. A classic example of different attitude of lucrative project is the Sydney Opera Home project Thomsett, 2002, that went 16 times over budget plus took 4 times more to complete than primarily planned. But the final impact which the Opera Home created was thus big which no one remembers the original missed goals. The project became a big achievement for the people at the same time a big failure from the project administration attitude. However, the Millennium Dome in London became a project promptly as well as on budget yet in the eyes of the British folks was considered a failure since it didnt deliver the awe plus glamour it was imagined to generate Cammack, 2005. "In the same way which standard requires each conformance to the standards plus fitness for utilize, project achievement requires a combined product achievement service, result, or outcome plus project administration success" Duncan, 2004.
The difference between criteria plus aspects is fluffy for many people. The Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary explains a criterion because "a standard by which you judge, choose about or deal with something" whilst a element is explained because "a fact or situation that influences the result of something". Lim & Mohamed applied those definitions to project achievement plus illustrated the real difference because show in Figure 1. It is obvious that critical aspects may lead to a show of occasions that eventually meet up with the total achievement criteria of the project, thus they shouldnt be selected because synonymous terms.
Many lists of achievement criteria have been introduced in the past decades by many scientists. Primal achievement criteria have been a built-in part of project administration principle because early definitions of project administration included the thus called Iron Triangle achievement criteria expense, time plus standard. Atkinson, 1999, p338
Atkinson continues which "because a discipline, project administration has not really changed or developed the achievement measuring criteria in almost 55 years". To meet up with the urgent demand for modernizing the from date achievement criteria, he recommend the Square Route figure 3 achievement criteria rather of the Iron Triangle, where he groups the criteria which different academics have recommended. The main change is the addition of qualitative objectives somewhat than quantitative, including the pros which different number of folks may receive from the project. These benefits are enjoyed from 2 views, one from the organisational view and another from the stakeholders view. It is apparent which each part need benefit differently from projects. As an example one organisation may gain income from achieving important goals when a project is completed at the same time these goals have a serious ecological impact in the stakeholders community. This means that a lucrative project should bargain amongst the benefits of the organisation plus the satisfaction of end consumers. The fourth nook of the Square Root is the Information System which include the subjects of maintainability, reliability plus validity of project outcomes.
One of the "Squares root" sides, organisational benefits, drew much attention considering of its importance plus it was further analysed. Kerzner 2001, p6 suggests 3 criteria from the organization attitude to allow a project to be successful. The first is that it should be completed "with minimal or mutually agreed upon scope changes", actually though stakeholders frequently have different views about projects results Maylor, 2005, p288. Second, "without annoying the primary function flow of the organization" considering a project has to help organisations everyday surgeries plus consider to create them better plus effective. Finally, it must be completed "without changing the organization culture" actually though projects are "almost solely concerned with change with knocking down the older plus gathering the new" Baguley, 1995, p8. A project managers primary responsibility is to make certain which he delivers change just where is necessary, otherwise they are condemned to obtain powerful resistance from all organisational departments Kerzner, 2001, p158 that eventually might lead to project failure.
A more structured approach to project achievement is grouping the criteria into groups. Wideman 1996, p3-4 explains 4 groups, all of them time dependent: "internal project objectives efficiency during the project, benefit to customer effectiveness in the brief term, direct contribution in the medium term plus future chance in the extended term". The characterization of time dependent is based found on the fact that achievement varies with time. Looking at the actual benefits of the organisation may be very hard, considering in some instances they dont actually know what they really want, yet is important to understand what the project is trying to achieve after completion time thus that achievement criteria are clearly defined in the early stages. It is quite a different approach, considering the focus moves from the present achievement criteria to the actual, in a way a project may be attempted during execution in case it is judged by criteria like expense plus standard, yet in the long term it may change as a successful background. A good example of the hypothesis is hosting the Olympic Games in Athens, Greece, that received mass critique each during the planning period, due to delays in construction time, plus when it was completed, due to huge expense. However the pros which Greece usually gain from the Olympic Games may be fully understood after 5 or years from the hosting year Athens2004.com.
All these success criteria "ought to be easy plus achievable plus, once defined, they should furthermore be ranked according to priority" Right Track Associates, 2003. Straightforward criteria are really easy to know by everyone involved with the project plus consequently dedication is assured. Unrealistic criteria may put a failure label about countless projects considering of the unreachable practices, may generate low team esteem plus team performance in future projects plus finally generate unfair frustration among stakeholders. As for goal problems, its inevitable which items goes wrong plus the project manager are in a tough situation where he should result in the correct choice having in your mind which they have to sacrifice minimal important achievement criterion.
As stated earlier, "achievement aspects are those inputs to the administration program which lead straight or ultimately to the achievement of the project or business" Cooke-Davies, 2002, p185. Many project owners "intuitively plus informally determine their own achievement aspects. However, if these aspects are not clearly identified plus recorded, they wont become part of formal project administration reporting procedure nor they become part of the ancient project data" Rad & Levin, 2002, p18. Belassi & Tukel 1996, p144 categorized these aspects into 5 distinct groups according that element they connect to:
1. The project manager
Having a project manager is not going to ensure the achievement of the project. He need a quantity of skills to utilize during the project to steer the residual team to effectively complete all the objectives. In the 2001 CHAOS report The Standish Group Global, 2001, p6, company, correspondence, responsiveness, procedure, results, operational, realism plus technical skills are stated because some of the most significant skills a project manager need to provide achievement. However, more resent analysis by Turner plus Muller 2005, p59 has concluded that "the leadership style plus competence of the project manager have zero impact about project success". It is quite interesting to explore why a highly decent expert body for project owners published these a contradictive position. A possible answer might be found in the truth which project managers results are difficult to confirm plus even more complicated to measure. If the project is lucrative, senior administration will claim which all external aspects were beneficial. On the contrary, if it turns as a failure, project manager easily becomes the scapegoat.
2. The project team
Project owners are very fortunate if they have the choice to consider their project team. More often, their team is inherited to the project from many sectors of the organisation. This is important to have a wise project team to benefit, with core skills which may be developed to core competences plus functions for the entire organisation. All members of the project team need to be devoted to the achievement of the project plus the total mission of the business. Apart using their skills plus dedication, project team subscribers need obvious correspondence channels to get into "both the practical manager plus the project manager within a matrix organization. Effective administration of the twin reporting is often a critical achievement element for the project" PMBOK Guidebook, 2004, p215.
3. The project itself
The kind of a project underlines some aspects which are crucial to achievement. As an example, inside project is urgent, the critical element therefore is time. The Wembley stadium is expected to be fully operational due to Mays 2006 FA Cup Final which is the primary target. However, the heighten of expense "which has tossed the managements data from kilter" Evans, 2005 wasnt a big matter at the time. The size, value of the project plus its uniqueness of escapades may be a challenge for the project manager whos selected to planning plus co-ordinating well-known plus easy escapades Belassi & Tukel, 1996, p144.
4 pest control athens ga . The organization
Top administration help is the main achievement element for countless independent analysis groups Tukel & Rom, 1998, p48 CHAOS Report, 2001, p4 Cleland & Ireland, 2002, p210 Tinnirello, 2002, p14 , that means that no project may finish effectively unless the project manager secures real help from the senior or operational administration. It is extremely difficult to work in a hostile environment where nobody knows the pros which the project usually deliver to the organisation. "Stakeholder administration plus contract techniques quantity of plus size of the contracts, interface amongst the different contracts plus the administration of contracts are individual achievement aspects that are furthermore considered part of organization issues" Torp, Austeng & Mengesha, 2004, p4.
5. The external environment
External environment could possibly be the political, economic, socio-culture plus technical PEST context in that the project is executed. Factors like the weather, function collisions or the governments beneficial or unfavourable law may affect the project in all of its stages. "Note which inside client is from outside the business, he need be considered as an external element influencing the project performance" Belassi & Tukel, 1996, p145. Competitors need be accounted because external aspects that can undermine project achievement considering the original project might be overshadowed by a more glamorous plus lucrative project announced by another organisation.
It is critical for a project manager to perfect what the stakeholders consider because a lucrative project. In order to avoid any shocks towards the end of the project, it has an urgent have to identify the different views of what achievement means prior to the project goes live. It is also vital to keep in mind that achievement criteria are the practices by which a project are judged, whilst achievement aspects are the reality which form the result of projects. Success criteria have changed considerably from time plus moved from the classic iron triangles view of time, expense plus standard to a broader framework that include benefits for the organisation plus consumer satisfaction. An additional framework to capture achievement criteria depending promptly was furthermore described. As for achievement aspects, these people were grouped into five distinct sets plus the lit views were discover to contradict found on the matter of how critical a project manager is to the final achievement of the project. A common factor stated by countless authors is senior administration help for the project plus its recognized among the most significant aspects off. In conclusion, early definition of achievement criteria may guarantee an undisputed view of how the project are judged plus early detection of achievement aspects usually guarantee a secure path to provide achievement.
1. A Guidebook to Project Management Body of Knowledge, 2004, third Edition, Project Management Institute, USA
2. Atkinson, 1999, Project management: expense, time plus standard, 2 right guesses as well as a phenomenon, its time to accept different achievement criteria, Global Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 6, pp 337-342, [Electronic]
3. Baguley, 1995, Managing Successful Projects: A guide for every manager, Pitman Publishing, London UK, p8
4. Belassi & Tukel, 1996, A brand-new framework for determining critical success-failure aspects in projects, Global Journal of Project Management Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 141-151, [Electronic]
5. Cambridge University, The Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary, 2005, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, UK
6. Cammack, 2005, Principles of Project Management - 1st session, MSc in Project Management, Lancaster University
7. Cleland & Ireland, 2002, p210, Project Management: Strategic Design plus implementation, McGraw-Hill Professional, USA
8. Cleland & Ireland, 2004, Project Managers Portable Handbook, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, USA, page 210
9. Cooke-Davies, The "real" achievement aspects about projects, Global Journal of Project Management vol.20, pp. 185190, [Electronic]
10. Duncan, 2004, Defining plus Measuring Project Success, Project Management Partners, [Online], Available: http://www.pmpartners.com/resources/defmeas_success.html , [2005, Nov.4]
11. Evans, 2005, Overdue plus over budget, time and time again, The Economist Jun 9th 2005, [Electronic]
12. Kerzner, 2001, Project Management - A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling plus Controlling, 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York
13. Kerzner, 2001, Strategic planning project administration with a project administration maturity model, Wiley & Sons, New York, page 158
14. Lim & Mohamed, 1999, Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination, Global Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 243-248, [Electronic]
15. Maylor, 2005, Project Management, Third Edition with CD Microsoft Project, Prentice Hall, UK, p288
16. Rad & Levin, 2002, The Advanced Project Management Office, St.Lucie Press, USA, page 18
17. Right Track Associates, 2003, Defining project achievement, [Online], Available: http://www.ittoolkit.com/cgi-bin/itmember/itmember.cgi?file=assess_pmsuccess.htm , [2005, Nov.5]
18. The official site of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games, [Online], Available: [http://www.athens2004.com/en/Legacy] , [2005, Nov.6]
19. The Standish Group Global, 2001, Extreme CHAOS: The Standish Group Global, [Electronic]
20. Thomsett, 2002, Radical Project Management, Prentice Hall, USA, page 16
21. Tinnirello, 2002, New Directions in Project Management, Auerbach, USA, page 14
22. Torp, Austeng & Mengesha, 2004, Critical Success aspects for project performance: a study on from-end exams of huge public projects in Norway
23. Tukel & Rom, 1998, Review of the Characteristics of Projects in diverse industries, Journal of Operations Management, Vol 16, pp43-61
24. Turner & Muller, 2005, The project managers leadership style because a achievement element about projects, Project Management Institute, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp 49-61
25. Wideman, 1996, Improving PM: Linking Success Criteria to Project Type, paper presented to the Southern Alberta Chapter, Project Management Institute, Calgary Symposium